Why would IBM include MF99005 on a cume package (2279) but not include the
rest of SF99707? But not including the rest is what IBM did. I am
looking at the cover letter for SF99707 at
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/sline003.nsf/PDFPbyNum/SF99707/$File/SF99707.pdf
and I can see MF55945 is on SF99707 but is not currently on any cume. I
could see that on other group PTF's that get updated on a different
schedule but every PTF listed in SF99707 has the same date as MF99005 (or
earlier).
Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
