Re: DDS field reference equivalent in SQL -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: DDS field reference equivalent in SQL
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:29:59 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Are field reference files really that useful? I understand the concept;
change itemNumber in your FREF, 'recompile' all files based off of this
column and now they are that size. But what about when you run over the
number of columns and other concerns?
What other use are they?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: DDS field reference equivalent in SQL , Luis Rodriguez
RE: DDS field reference equivalent in SQL , Stone, Joel

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.