On 07 Nov 2012 07:38, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
<<SNIP>. if you put a real date field in there you can't CPYF
characters over it - I tried. You can still clobber numbers with
character data this way though. I am hoping it respects constraints
also.
If "it" refers to the CPYF, then the question is moot. The
protection of the database, as provided by constraints, is enforced
irrespective of the utility\application being used. A constraint is
implemented at the database level, and every interface to the database
will be /constrained/ by the rules applied to the data. Every supported
"method" that performs a data operation must live within the
restrictions established by the constraints for the data; e.g. for a
"WRITE" aka "INSERT" method. Unless a constraint has been removed, or
both is allowed to be and is disabled [e.g. RMVPFCST, ALTER DROP
CONSTRAINT, or CHGPFCST], then the rules will be enforced for each
supported method. All interfaces to the database, including the "copy"
feature, have access only to those supported methods. If any feature
could defeat an established\enabled constraint, then that would be an
integrity issue for the data, and thus would be a defect.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.