Re: Reply list entry handling?

Vern:

Assuming you can somehow avoid the MCH6801 that will result from trying to use a pointer to a system domain object to examine the internals of an IBM-defined object, this approach seems far more likely to be subject to change from release to release than relying on the layout of spool file records, e.g. using the output of the WRKRPYLE *PRINT command. :-o

Mark S. Waterbury

> On 11/30/2012 9:53 AM, Vernon Hamberg wrote:

I ran the DMPSYSOBJ command on this object -

QSYS/DMPSYSOBJ OBJ(QSYSRPYL) CONTEXT(QSYS) TYPE(19) SUBTYPE(D8)

Here's the result -

0000A0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000005 00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000 * *
0000C0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000020 000000F0
00000010 A100000A * 0 ~ *
0000E0 C3D7C1F0 F7F0F000 01C40000 00000000 00000020 00000110
000000D0 B1000014 *CPA0700 D }£ *
000100 D9D7C7F0 F0F0F000 01C40000 00000000 00000020 00000130
000000F0 B100001E *RPG0000 D 0£ *
000120 C3C2C5F0 F0F0F000 01C40000 00000000 00000020 00000150
00000110 B1000028 *CBE0000 D & £ *
000140 D7D3C9F0 F0F0F000 01C40000 00000000 00000040 00000010
00000130 82200CD2 *PLI0000 D b K*
000160 C3D7C1F3 F2C2F200 01C90011 89E28599 8985A240 D581A589
8781A396 990000FF *CPA32B2 I iSeries Navigator *
000180 FF00FFFF 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000E70 00000000
00000150 00001B58 * ø & ì*

Seems to be a count (x'05' in line 1), an entry length (x'20' and x'40'
here) and number of codesor offsets - do I hear the term "reverse
engineering"?

Vern