Have you looked at reducing the amount of data being sent to the journal?
MINENTDTA(*FILE or *FLDBDY) and RCVSIZOPT(*RMVINTENT *MINFIXLEN)

http://www.iprodeveloper.com/article/availability/journal-insights---minimizing-what-flows-into-your-journal-receiver-65285

http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/ibmi/administrator/systemsmanagement/Minimizing-Your-Journal-Traffic-Without-Disappoint/

HTH,
Charles


On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:48 PM, A Paul <amandapaul1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



I'm looking at implications or considerations for keeping the journals
for longer period or dumping them to tape rather than getting rid of
completely. .
We've space considerations on the system as Global journal receivers take
1/3 to 3/4TB per day, we used to keep 3 days of these and it was reduced to
1 day citing that you would always find out any production issues within
that timeframe.

Thanks,
A
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.