Hi Mark

I don't see any benefit in fighting it - as you yourself say, nothing we do will change it - so I think it's better to accept what is. And give gentle hints or reminders to others we talk to.

OK - enough of sounding a little like Trevor - which ain't all bad, eh? Without the accent! Uffda!

Vern

On 12/12/2012 7:42 AM, Mark D wrote:
IBM I is a horrible name and nothing any of us can do will change that. But we sure can fight it.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 12, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dave,

You should call it IBM i. That is the current Operating System name, and
if you want to look current on your CV, you should be up to date. Of
course, you should also include that you have had experience with AS/400,
iSeries. You may also reference OS/400 and i5/OS, and make a note that IBM
i runs on Power Systems.

It is important that you look like you are up to date. Otherwise, you will
be getting a job coding RPGII or RPGIII and miss out on all the cool new
stuff that a modern IBM i can do.

FWIW, there was never such a thing as i5. There was a System i5 for a
short time - maybe a month, but that was actually a System i before the
branding was finalized. And i5/OS was the name of the operating system for
only 2 years.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.