It has been posted on midrange-L several times, and is in all the press:
http://ibmsystemsmag.blogs.com/you_and_i/2012/12/future-of-ibm-i-caac-buzz.
html



On 12/12/12 12:40 PM, "Winchester Terry"
<terry.winchester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Do you have a link to the 14 year claim?

Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Perry
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:11 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Software Vendors (And US too) - A small rant

Looks like I have to repeat myself.

The smaller number of IBM i searches is because we have not
yet started
writing IBM i on the web wholesale. Once we get off our complaints and
actually promote the platform branding that we will have for at least
another 14 years, then the complaint becomes moot. Catch 22 is so
difficult when everyone is making excuses, rather than
talking about how
good IBM i on Power really can be.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.