IMHO adding 'on Power Systems' leverages that brand recognitions and clarifies for the unknowing that it doesn't run on inferior technology. Given the incredible benefits we got from merging System i and System p into POWER that's worth mentioning. Do I do it every time? Of course not, mostly IBM i stands alone.

- DrF

On 12/12/2012 12:55 PM, Peter Dow wrote:
Doesn't "IBM i on POWER systems" imply either limitation "IBM i only
runs on POWER systems, nothing else", or the possibility of IBM i on
other hardware, but it's somehow different? "IBM i on AMD systems"?

Do I have to say "Windows on Intel", "Ubuntu on AMD", "Android on
Snapdragon"?

Going farther afield, "Camry on Toyota chassis", "F150 on Ford"?

Anything wrong with just "IBM i"?

--
*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
petercdow@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:petercdow@xxxxxxxxx>
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.