I agree with you Paul. But Luis point was that there are actually some
differences in the compilers. Occasionally IBM will issue a ptf that says
a recompile is recommended. Normally to take advantage of some new
feature.
I understand Luis point but wouldn't do this.
Now, different shops define "production" differently. For example, we are
a manufacturer. Our production machine is used to run ERP (and lots of
other stuff). Having the tools on there is a carry over from the days of
a previous package whose general ledger report writer generated and
compiled RPG on the fly. I'd like to remove the tools from that. We have
several other production lpars who run only Domino. They have no tools.
A software house may define production as the one they spin off code for
distribution to customers. They may feel a need to have the tools on that
box. I don't see it, but they might. Then again, I keep all my boxes at
7.1. They may not. And I'll stop there to avoid going off on a tangent.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.