Re: Live Partition Mobility Question 'vs' POWER-HA. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Live Partition Mobility Question 'vs' POWER-HA.
From: Sue Baker <smbaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 14:02:45 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 1/31/2013 1:25 PM, DrFranken wrote:

LPM also has some fairly steep requirements such as 100.00% hosted
everything (DASD, COMM, Tape etc) VIOS is required as the hosting
partition, All DASD must be on SAN with NIiV capability.

LPM will happily work with vSCSI defined LUNs from the SAN storage. It just means a whole lot move effort in getting it set up and to protect the LUNs from inadvertent use the the machine where the LPAR currently isn't running.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.