Re: What good is ILE? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: What good is ILE?
From: CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:29:37 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 04 Feb 2013 04:02, Richard Schoen wrote:

I do a lot of work with PASE and cannot count the number of hours
that I have burned trying to troubleshoot an issue with a program
that was originally compiled as CLLE and then simply recompiled
back to OPM CL and it worked fine.

Now to be fair I do a lot of calling to Qshell and Pase code
within my CL's, but personally I have gone back to wrapping
anything that calls PASE or Java via Qshell as a regular CLP.

As a rhetorical question... What was the outcome from the APARs that reported those problems?

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.