Re: SSD Best practices -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SSD Best practices
From: Sue Baker <smbaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:36:33 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2/14/2013 3:48 PM, Gqcy wrote:

But, has anyone done a benchmark of physical disk to main storage
(SETOBJACC) versus setting the object to SDD?

SETOBJACC will always outperform SSD. Memory speeds are in sub-microsecond versus SSD sub-millisecond.

Depending on object size, you may have to upgrade to a POWER7 795 in order to get enough main storage to put all the data you want on SSD into main storage.

Follow-Ups:

SETOBJACC Was: SSD Best practices , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.