Re: SSD Best practices -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SSD Best practices
From: Sue Baker <smbaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:36:33 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2/14/2013 3:48 PM, Gqcy wrote:

But, has anyone done a benchmark of physical disk to main storage
(SETOBJACC) versus setting the object to SDD?

SETOBJACC will always outperform SSD. Memory speeds are in sub-microsecond versus SSD sub-millisecond.

Depending on object size, you may have to upgrade to a POWER7 795 in order to get enough main storage to put all the data you want on SSD into main storage.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

SETOBJACC Was: SSD Best practices , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.