I've read that some people think that because the math behind AES is so simple that there are inherent weaknesses. You don't know if quantum computing will take off. Who knows what the future holds for computing. Simply saying "hey here is my encrypted harddrive with financial secrets" is not a wager I'd ever be willing to make. Plus sidechannel attacks are getting more and more interesting every day.

Strong crypto is a security layer. Security is only layers and is not and can not be considered definitive. Nothing is definitive other than total destruction.

The disks *really* need to be wiped (several times) before your respective A's are covered.

Thanks,
Mark

On 2/22/2013 2:05 PM, Matt Olson wrote:
God help us if AES 256 gets cracked easily in 15 years. We'll have to start beating stones and sticks together because we'll be thrown into the stone age with all the havoc that will do to things such as eCommerce and lots of other areas of business.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.