Here's one for the SQL experts -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Here's one for the SQL experts
From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:17:07 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Given this SQL (the names have been changed to protect the innocent):

SELECT CALLRECVIEW.ACCOUNT_ID, MAX(DATE_OF_CALL)
FROM ACCTVIEW, CALLRPTVIEW
WHERE ACCTVIEW.ACCOUNT_ID = CALLRECVIEW.ACCOUNT_ID
GROUP BY CALLRECVIEW.ACCOUNT_ID

we (and this was just handed to me, the first I'd heard of it) seem unable to add any fields from ACCTVIEW to the SELECT.

I'm about to suggest changing it to "FROM ACCTVIEW JOIN CALLRECVIEW ON ACCTVIEW.ACCOUNT_ID = CALLRECVIEW.ACCOUNT_ID," but would that make any difference.

What are we doing wrong?

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Here's one for the SQL experts , Luis Rodriguez
Re: Here's one for the SQL experts , Tommy . Holden

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.