Re: qtemp performance oddity. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: qtemp performance oddity.
From: Bryan Dietz <bdietz400@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:56:06 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

MF28377 is not on a CUMe eithe, it was released 05/15/2002.
The last V5r1 CUMe was C4300510 (November 01, 2004)

Not sure about it being on the HIPERS though.

Bryan

rob@xxxxxxxxx said the following on Thu, 2/28/2013 3:43 PM:

Good catch. Bad thing is that ptf said it wasn't on a cume. I wonder if
the ptf which replaced it is, MF28377? What do you see further down the
list?

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

Re: qtemp performance oddity. , DrFranken

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.