RE: IBM job scheduler -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: IBM job scheduler
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:07:53 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>
We use the SAVOBJ QDFTJOBSCD, HLDJOBSCDE *ALL *ALL method then just RSTOBJ
to return to the way it was. (Chuck mentioned this as well.)
</snip>

Not a bad technique. A minor concern may be what if other changes were
made after the HLDJOBSCDE? If you're just bouncing your server and you
just want to ensure that jobs don't start that's one thing. If you're
running for an extended length of time (like a H/A switch) that's another.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: IBM job scheduler , Porterfield, Sean

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.