We save to local virtual tape image catalogs. Then we ftp them to another
system. Then we dupe them to tape. And actually BRMS keeps track of
which physical tape has a save of which particular object on the source
system.
We've not tried NFS. Actually I'm pretty new at NFS. I am using it now
on a few lpars and it gets the job done.

The question becomes, does it slow down the actual save? If so, is it
significant enough to justify more local disk to speed up the process? We
bring up the services denied during the actual save, after the save is
done but before we start ftping the data over. So our outage window does
not include the transfer time.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.