Re: IBMi25 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: IBMi25
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:44:15 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Steve,

I get the idea that you think that nothing that IBM has added to IBM i
(and it's predecessors) in that 25 years has had any significance because
you want IBM to address your current wish of the day. And, if IBM
addresses that then it would no longer be anything of any significance
because you would then have a new wish of the day, and that if IBM doesn't
address it must be because IBM is sounding the death knell of IBM i (if
not the entire free world).

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: IBMi25 , Steve Richter
Re: IBMi25 , Steve Richter

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.