Re: Why host? Was: IBM i vs VIOS for Host Partition -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Why host? Was: IBM i vs VIOS for Host Partition
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:07:00 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Jim,

Thanks. I thought the arms would be a better payback than the additional
controllers.

And, I meant the second paragraph to be totally independent of the first,
like the first never happened.
<snip>
I consider this a good enough reason to host. Are there others? Well,
perhaps VIOS san support?
</snip>
Meaning basically that if you want all disk on SAN isn't hosting required?
Also asking for other reasons to host vs dedicated.

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: Why host? Was: IBM i vs VIOS for Host Partition , brad.lovelady
Re: Why host? Was: IBM i vs VIOS for Host Partition , Jack Kingsley

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.