On 25 Apr 2013 13:50, Needles,Stephen J wrote:
I deleted and re-created everything, meticulously following what you
had described.  And it works!
The weird thing is...I thought that that was what I'd done in the
first place!  Before I started going through all of the gyrations
with changing o *SQL and everything.
  I have had many similar bang-my-head moments with regard to PATH and 
CURRENT SCHEMA.  But usually after a request to PRTSQLINF and\or a 
SELECT CURRENT SCHEMA, CURRENT PATH FROM SYSIBM.SYSDUMMY1 [and on older 
releases, adjusting between the period and a slash based on the naming 
rule in effect], I am usually able to see the problem... even if not 
also see how I got there.
  For example just recently, I had a prior SQL application that ran in 
my job, but the request had failed.  That failed request somehow caused 
my interactive SQL session to adopt the CURRENT SCHEMA set by that prior 
failing application, instead of using the current schema that should 
have been defaulted [to *LIBL] and remained established in my *existing* 
session that was selected for my request to STRSQL.
  I also seem to recall that [on v5r3] the request to SET CURRENT 
SCHEMA DEFAULT does not properly revert that register to *LIBL when 
running with NAMING(*SYS) within a RUNSQLSTM script, although it works 
as expected within STRSQL.  That is a very frustrating anomaly [apparent 
defect], because then a single script could not create multiple routines 
with different defaults for both where the objects created for an 
unqualified CREATE statement will reside and where unqualified 
table-references are located.
I wonder what stray thought lead me down the wrong path.
  Just a guess, but probably having [accidentally] used an environment 
that was started with NAMING(*SQL).  The natural consequence of which, 
and thus the conclusions that "to get it to work, I needed to qualify 
the table" and "had to change over to *SQL rather than *SYS for naming 
conventions and had to qualify the UDF" both would make sense.... *if* 
"library" was not the equivalent of the "authorization id" and where 
"library" was the qualifier used that /resolved/ the difficulties.
  Having a current library with the same name as my user profile name 
made it easy for me to accidentally create objects using *SQL naming 
without any problems, only to find later that I had not been creating 
with *SYS naming as I had presumed to be the case; i.e. the effects were 
not conspicuous because my current library name matched the 
authorization identifier.  Now that the system I use has a different 
library name than my user profile name, the effects of accidentally 
using *SQL naming and unqualified names is diagnosed swiftly and clearly 
:-)  As long as a library name matching my user profile never exists or 
if such a library does exist but is not authorized to me, then the 
possibility of making that mistake again is almost nil.
  However the speculation is moot I suppose, since the issue is 
resolved :-)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.