Re: SQL views missing after Cumulative PTF's applied

[Robert Clay <zreclay@xxxxxxxxx>]

I've already opened a PMR (thought of that first, of course).  Just 
wanted to know if anyone else had a similar experience while waiting for 
IBM to contact me.

We don't have H/A and not very many of the objects are journaled so no 
joy there.

Thanks for the comments anyway.

"Contrariwise, if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would 
be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."--Tweedledee

On 04/30/2013 2:59 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Are you journalling your files either just because, or because you are
> using a H/A package like Mimix?  If so, check the audit journals for
> deletion time.
>
> I'd definitely open a ticket with IBM.  Let's say your DDS defined file
> magically disappeared, would you say "darn, I hate DDS.  Must be something
> flakey with that.  Oh well, stuff happens.  No need to bother IBM about
> this"?  Heck no, you wouldn't say that!
>
> I'd definitely open a ticket.  If not for you, then for all those Luddites
> who will use your experience to either:
> A - Avoid putting on PTFs
> B - Avoid DDL defined files.
> Not that they would use that as a reason to quickly move to 7.1...
>
>
> Rob Berendt