RE: JOBD analysis

["Stone, Joel" <Joel.Stone@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I understood Rob's "True" comment, but I don't understand " IMO, False...  On every statement\intimation."

Are you saying that the JOBD many-year limitation of 25 libs had nothing to do with some repeating field maximum reached underneath the covers?



-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CRPence
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:31 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: JOBD analysis

On 10 May 2013 03:37, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> True.

   Really?  A one-word reply with no attribution to what message, nor 
contextual\quoted text to clarity to what comment(s), that one-word 
reply was directed?
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201305/msg00314.html

   IMO, False...  On every statement\intimation.