I dont get why both IBM and Cisco didnt dispute that trademark. IOS is the
cisco operating system from old and i5 OS and i/OS were names for IBM i
before it became IBM i.


On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Monnier, Gary <Gary.Monnier@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

I'd really like to see IBM place their emphasis on the software rather
than the hardware. Something like...

IBM i/OS 7.1 running on Power Systems 7, 6 and 5
IBM i/OS 6.1 running on Power Systems 7, 6 and 5
IBM i/OS 5.4 running on Power Systems 4 and 5
IBM i/OS 5.4.5 running on Power Systems 4 and 5

A suggestion for what it is worth. May be trademark issues now with
Apple's iOS.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CRPence
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:38 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: AS/400 Server.

On 10 May 2013 07:08, Anderson, Kurt wrote:
I always try to call our system what it is, a Power 7 running IBM i
7.1. However, the Cumulative PTF DVD we just got from IBM says this:

System i5
OS/400 Cumulative PTFs
V7R1M0...

Made me chuckle.


I will not offer what is my guess as to why nobody has changed the
first two mis-references, but...

The conspicuous difference between V#R#M# and V.R will probably
remain. The latter was purely a /marketing/ aspect; i.e. for naming
consistency in marketing: "IBM OS\product Version.Release". The OS
however, still maintains the V##R##M## information as integral data, and
the support\service identification [e.g. PTFs] mimics that pattern
specific to the OS. There is little reason that should ever change, and
some good reasons not to change that naming; e.g. there is no benefit
for consistency in cross-platform release naming, for the ability to
search technical databases of a single platform, especially for which
the dot-separated-digits do not provide for a well-formed search token
that is conspicuously not just some decimal number or even a date.

Of course that does not mean to imply they could not *additionally*
include the proper marketing name on the service-related labeling.

--
Regards, Chuck
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.