RE: CHGUSRPRF no longer fixes NetServer access

[Dan Kimmel <dkimmel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I understand your position. I want others to realize that this avenue of expression is open to them.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CRPence
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:54 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CHGUSRPRF no longer fixes NetServer access

   Ahhh... OK.

   Arghh... I guess the only good excuse that remains for me to continue doing nothing, is to avoid associating my /name/ with the request.  I suppose someone will tell me next that the COMMON requests can be made anonymously :-)

   No matter.  In this case, I really do not care enough to do anything. 
  Per my being "not a customer", the poor implementation of their current corrective action [that nullifies use of CHGUSRPRF] will have no noticeable impact on my life.  IOW, I am too lazy to act, beyond offering my opinion on this list, because I would not [in the foreseeable future] benefit from any change; nor would I be impacted by the current revision.  If Rob or anyone else thinks they would benefit from IBM implementing my idea, they are certainly welcome to carry that idea forward as their own DCR.