RE: IFS mapped drive issues -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: IFS mapped drive issues
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 11:56:50 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes, third party packages make it harder to implement things like program
only access in which the only way to access data is by programs which
adopt authority. Thus handling the security of multiple databases. When
we had the BBU's the people handling customer X's data could not see
customer Y's data. We had plants dedicated to particular large customers.
Or, even of more concern, they buy from each other. You sure didn't want
01 being able to see the cost of an item produced by 02 and sold to 01 at
the profit margin.
I feel your pain.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: IFS mapped drive issues , Steinmetz, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.