Auditing Was: 6.1 and 7.1 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Auditing Was: 6.1 and 7.1
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:14:02 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

If asked for that I could easily give them the set up programs I run for
new lpars. That has all the CHGSYSVAL's, CHGCMDDFT's, and so on. But as
an auditor I don't know as if I would trust them. That program gets
enhanced with each new lpar, release, etc. So, whose to say that the
other lpars would really match?

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: Auditing Was: 6.1 and 7.1 , Paul Nelson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.