Auditing Was: 6.1 and 7.1 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Auditing Was: 6.1 and 7.1
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:14:02 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

If asked for that I could easily give them the set up programs I run for
new lpars. That has all the CHGSYSVAL's, CHGCMDDFT's, and so on. But as
an auditor I don't know as if I would trust them. That program gets
enhanced with each new lpar, release, etc. So, whose to say that the
other lpars would really match?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Auditing Was: 6.1 and 7.1 , Paul Nelson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.