On 19 Jul 2013 09:21, Stone, Joel wrote:
Maybe I am all wrong, don't know. But in Win7, the date shown on
Windows Explorer keeps the history.
In OS400, it seems all history is purged with CRTDUPOBJ and/or
SAVOBJ/RSTOBJ.
<<SNIP>>
Not /wrong/ per se, but certainly overlooking the obvious distinction
of the IBM i OS as compared to many others. To be clear, the IBM i
[OS/400, S/38] origin, is as an *object-based* system; quite different
than most other.
Consider any tangible /object/ in everyday life, perhaps for example,
a classic car. If someone creates a duplicate of that car, what exactly
are the creation date, change date, and last-used date for both the old
car and the new car? IMNSHO there is *no logical way* to argue that
they should be the same.
Perhaps however there were some stickers on the rear\inside of the
driver-side door which indicate the manufacture-date [and perhaps
equivalents of the other attributes]. Arguably a /duplicate/ of that
car which intends to fully mimic the old car might want to have its new
stickers reflect the same values that are recorded on the original\old
car. As I noted in my prior reply however, such additional attributes
are separate from the known\reality, and there would be no integrity in
referencing that sticker as an accurate reflection of reality, because
the new sticker with the copied values would be a misrepresentation;
i.e. the copied dates portray a false claim.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.