Re: TLS 1.1 and 1.2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

CVE-2011-3389

Here you go.

On 31/07/13 15:12, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

What I have found is that if you can get an exact "CVE" number then
IBM really starts to get concerned. We have Qualys contracted to
perform benevolent hacking. They consider an obsolete bind version
a real concern. IBM considered it a big yawn. But when I listed 7
potential vulnerabilities with their CVE numbers IBM jumped. Now
the PMR is getting some action.


Rob Berendt

- --
|_|0|_| Yvan Janssens
|_|_|0| Observe. Hack. Meet. https://www.ohm2013.org
|0|0|0| ['2013-07-31','2013-08-04']
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJR+Q19AAoJEElyT3Tqk/McaAUIAKKVQVkdg5a8ZSH8/7hOHPST
eSlE1eGeSevpUvzBy8jZNxEYxLxGN81hsHHB+tdRUMQec38kpJ/8OqF+4wOBa6ct
6kTJJ3rgpMWSaa3lt4JUbyqMmjNOVPZz8HLG7prFR/ieOluUSkXkv7nRESpHJuYa
xFR6prtYd5l09LaHSykr6vFF1RNF3db1Myh4tLeZDXcDn/Y0ZFyJjsW6icyc/crr
zdTLPuVkH8gVwiloNPqa+8bsSvXT6IMSd4uJ8bGp+FNGmThrzG9SnRfvO47at7YN
lSBAiTgdzclYG0V6+Tk5pX0zcWyo6AjgZmf7LxGRkv/aJl23xX7MlHNekiYqcgE=
=npqs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----