Re: 27x132 oddity

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

  The Query/400 report writer is the report writer used to produce 
output for non-DRDA STRSQL reporting.  I do not recall if the 
Interactive Profile Entry storage for the /preferred/ display-size 
setting is distinct for each utility, or the preference value is shared 
betwixt.  I seem to recall having enhanced the STRSQL utility long ago 
to have its own stored preference, such that the interactive displayed 
reports presented by RUNQRY [and WRKQRY] reports would have their own 
Query/400 preference separate from the interactive reports presented in 
the STRSQL.

  Regardless, the shared report writer extracts the /last-selected/ 
report-width setting and then will attempt to establish that 
report-width if the device supports it.  Thus if the last-selected 
report-width was 80-byte, then the next report will also be 80-byte, 
*irrespective* of what the device supports.  However if the 
last-selected report-width was 132-byte, then the report will present in 
the 132-wide report *if* the device supports it or present the 80-width 
report when the device does not support 132-wide.

  The [non-migrated from s/36] user profile defaults the storage of the 
IPE to hex zeroes, and the zero-bit(s) value indicates that the 
user-preference is to show the 132-wide report-width if the device 
supports it.  Thus the uninitialized setting and the last-selected 
setting of 132-wide as the stored choice will effect what appears to the 
user as auto-expanded to 132 whenever the device supports 132-wide.  And 
for any user that last-selected 80-wide [per use of F22="Width 80"] will 
no longer experience the apparent auto-expanded effect because they had 
previously explicitly chosen a preference of 80-wide, and they must 
press F22="Width 132" to explicitly reset their preference for 132-wide 
reports [that F-key is available only when reporting from a 
132-wide-capable device].  Note however that this /auto-expansion/ is 
not based upon the width of the report to be presented, but based upon 
the stored preference for report width, in conjunction with the 
capabilities of the device.

Regards, Chuck

On 02 Aug 2013 12:31, Steve McKay wrote:
> Auto-expands fine for me, for her - not so much (even on the same
> emulation session).
>
> On 8/2/2013 11:33 AM, Gary Thompson wrote:
> > My experience is STRSQL does not auto-expand ?
> >
> > All my IBM i Access sessions auto-expand for spool files
> > and output from *QRYDFN, but I never see that for STRSQL.
> >
> > I would pay a dollar two forty for that.