I'd dearly love to know why the vendor wishes to stop at 6.1.
Is it because they've not tested it on 7.1?
Is it because of some other issue? Like my favorite pet peeve is how IBM
always changes CPYTOIMPF with every release.
If it's because they like to stay one release behind for "stability"
reasons, smack them upside the head. Three years plus of service, eight
cumes, six technology refreshes; that's enough of a shakedown cruise.
I'm having a tough enough of a time getting IBM to patch security
breaches, now, in 7.1 with them attempting to postpone it to some future
release.
Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
