Re: getting error on this view

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

  Yet we were told that by your having "put the AND there <ed: where I 
saw you needed an AND> and formatted again - it went fine."  Thus if 
what was implied by that commentary is true, then indeed, we know the 
formatter used will not be useful to diagnose the improperly qualified 
column references.?  That is not to say "I told you so", but to 
emphasize that any particular SQL /formatter/ might not be capable of 
diagnosing problems with the DB2 for i SQL syntax... so the actual 
database parser and syntax checker may be effectively required.

Regards, Chuck

On 15 Sep 2013 12:27, Vernon Hamberg wrote:
> We don't know WHERE the OP put the missing AND - so we can't speak
> to whether the formatter was useful or not.
>
> On 9/15/2013 2:16 PM, CRPence wrote:
> > On 15 Sep 2013 10:14, Vernon Hamberg wrote:
> > > <<SNIP>>
> > > I put the AND there and formatted again - it went fine.
> >
> > And that proves, that SQL formatter, is not entirely helpful with
> > regard to resolving the SQL5001 error :-(