Re: Keeping A Specific TCP/IP Port Alive -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Keeping A Specific TCP/IP Port Alive
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:25:07 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm about the greatest fan of converting from SNA to pure TCP. However,
if you're going to stay with SNA you'd better make the jump from Anynet to
EE (aka Enterprise Extenders). You do not want to be the holdup from
getting to a current OS.

6.1 is the last version to run Anynet
http://www-947.ibm.com/systems/support/i/planning/upgrade/v7r1/software.html

Egads, I hope no one uses that as an excuse to stop at 6.1 and not go to
7.1. Those who have drank the EE kool aid have said it's no big deal.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.