On 10/24/2013 3:13 PM, Stone, Joel wrote:
At many medium and most larger shops, in-house development is billed
(with funny-money) to a user department and tracked like cash
expenditures. Hours are tracked to the nth degree as a cost control
measure.

I really don't see how that is relevant for agile methodologies. Costs are easier to track and control when developing with agile (IMO at least). Work is done in smaller units, so you can control costs at a finer grain.

Agile is used exclusively in start-ups for example years ago Mark
Zuckerberg started coding with little effort spent on requirements
and all effort spent on coding.

My mother always told me ... never EVER speak in absolutes.

As I mentioned before, we use agile at PTC (both for Implementer and Integrity development). It works quite well for us and we are clearly not a startup.

david



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.