Re: SAVE 21 - console required? Or just controlling subsystem -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SAVE 21 - console required? Or just controlling subsystem
From: "Buzz Fenner" <bfenner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:22:50 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:06:52, Evan Harris wrote:

However, those terminals didn't need TCP unlike most current access
mechanisms. A Console device is likely to connect over the short TCP stack
and continue operating during your save whereas a device just transferred
into QCTL is likely to fail as soon as TCP is ended.

I can testify from -experience- that this is what will happen. IBM told me
as much, also. Without twinax, you're forced to use LAN Console and the
short TCP stack.

Buzz

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.