I think I have mentioned this before, but I will again; per having
persisted as an issue, unchanged over years of your replies to these
lists\forums...
Do you realize that your email [or news] client is truncating the
first letter of every secondary-line in any paragraphs of your quoted
text? While I abhor leaving effectively no context in a reply, munging
the quoted text in that manner, is quite possibly as irritating an
effect for the archives [and irritating to the author whose text was
improperly quoted]:
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201312/msg00260.html
Just in case the effect was not obvious in review of the archive of
the message, I kept the misquoting shown below, in three lines of my
quoted text from earlier. What is with "Audit evel" and
"object-specific racking"? I wrote neither... so the quoting is flawed.
Regards, Chuck
On 09-Dec-2013 10:59 -0800, fbocch2595@xxxxxxx wrote:
<<SNIP>>
On CRPence Fri, Dec 6, 2013 4:47 pm
The ZC and ZR are "object auditing" vs "action auditing". The Audit
evel controls action auditing; there are seemingly object-specific
racking there however, most notably the three special values:
<<SNIP>>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.