No experience here but did you read the entire blog post?
"One final note - the best performance improvement may be seen with a
well-balanced directory tree in which all objects qualify for the save.
In situations where a large number of objects reside in a single
directory, few objects qualify for the save, or the system is memory
constrained, performance may degrade with ASYNCBRING(*YES) specified."
That looks you would definitely not be a candidate.
On Friday, December 13, 2013 2:11 PM, Mike Cunningham <mike.cunningham@xxxxxxx> wrote:
http://ibmsystemsmag.blogs.com/i_can/2012/01/achieve-faster-ifs-save-times-using-sav-with-asyncbring.html
has anyone with a lot of small IFS objects used this with good results? We have about 750,000 tiff images, all in a single directory, and wondering if this is something to try.
Thanks
Mike Cunningham
Pennsylvania College of Technology
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
