Re: I get CPF9E7F on 9117-MMC P7

[Roberto José Etcheverry Romero <yggdrasil.raiker@xxxxxxxxx>]

On the same topic, i was wondering if 4 IBM i partitions with 1 cpu
assigned each but 4 virtual cpus and uncapped weights would count as 4
procs or 16...


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Tsvetan Marinov
<tsetso.marinov@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have very strange issue here and I blame the OS API but just in case
> maybe someone has encountered the same issue.
>
> So i have 7 V6R1 LPAR's on 9117-MMC P7 which are in a separate shared
> processor pool with max 4 prc. limit to this pool and 4 prc OS licenses.
> WRKLICINF for 5761SS!/V6/5051 shows that the usage limit is 4 but the usage
> count accross all LPAR's is 16 which is not possible for sure because of
> the limitation of the shared pool.
>
> I get CPF9E7F every hour and I'm getting anoyed since my customer thinks
> that this is a BIG issue, which is not :
>
>
> Message ID . . . . . . :   CPF9E7F       Severity . . . . . . . :   40
> Message type . . . . . :   Information
> Date sent  . . . . . . :        Time sent  . . . . . . :
>
> Message . . . . :   i5/OS usage limit exceeded - operator action required.
> Cause . . . . . :   The processor usage limit of 4 processors for product
>   5761SS1, license term V6, feature 5051 has been exceeded.
>     -- Current processor usage across all active i5/OS partitions is 4,00.
>     -- Current processor usage for the local partition is 1,00.
>
>
> I checked 100 times that the LPAR is in the correct pool but even then it
> shows the wrong usage across all the LPAR's.
>
> My system is with firmware AM740_100.
>
> I assume that API QSYS/QLZARCAPI is bugged but I can't be sure.
>
> Any clues, PTF or some trick?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Tsetso
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.