Yes, scheduled job once a week on R&D.
Every day on Production
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 8:52 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: System save / Tape performance issue
Do you have some old/new results of PRTDSKINF?
Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
From: "Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'"
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/23/2014 04:46 PM
Subject: RE: System save / Tape performance issue
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Correct, I need to increase the BRMS time limit.
But any ideas on how to find where an extra 60 minutes of save came from.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John.BresinaJr
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:30 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: System save / Tape performance issue
I am guessing he is using this in BRMS:
Controlling subsystem:
Allow backups in batch . . . . . . . . *YES
Restricted state time limit . . . . . 360
John Bresina Jr | Sr Engineer | TTS Server Tech - Tandem/System
i/Mainframe | Target | 33 S 6th St | Minneapolis, Mn 55402 | 612 304
3665 (ph)
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:28 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: System save / Tape performance issue
What is this "system max restricted time"? Some monitoring software you
have?
Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail
to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
From: "Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'"
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/23/2014 03:32 PM
Subject: System save / Tape performance issue
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I did an unattended system save on our Pencor06 R&D partition Monday
evening, the save ended abnormally because it didn’t complete within the
360 minutes.
I will be increasing the system max restricted time from 360 to 420, just
in case this occurs again.
System was at 39% of 12,565 or 4900.
System was in restricted state.
Save was using 2 of 4 LTO5 drives. Normally my overall rate is 900 gb hr.
I expected the save to be done in about 5 hours.
Actual was 6+ hours, if it would have finished.
It was saving the IFS when it ended because of the time limit.
Any thoughts of where to look for issues.
Thank You
_____
Paul Steinmetz
IBM i Systems Administrator
Pencor Services, Inc.
462 Delaware Ave
Palmerton Pa 18071
610-826-9117 work
610-826-9188 fax
610-349-0913 cell
610-377-6012 home
psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pencor.com/
midrange.com
