RE: Configuring Hot spare protection -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Configuring Hot spare protection
From: Sue Baker <sue.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 02:38:44 +0000 (UTC)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 04 Feb
2014 20:08:57 GMT:

If my configuration has one of each pair on a different loop,
then I would need 2 hot spares, correct.

Correct. One hot spare on each loop gives you the best chance
of maintaining loop level protection.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.