Re: i5 Security info and training -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: i5 Security info and training
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:16:40 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

That's unacceptable in this day and age.

I'd be sure and point out that IBM's jobs don't run under a QSECOFR class
profile.

Assuming you've got maint with IBM. You might consider asking IBM to apply
pressure on the vendor.

Charles

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

3rd party vendor claims their job(s) must run as QSECOFR, I tested and
made it work in R&D without QSECOFR.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.