Re: Power 6 vs Power 8 backup speeds -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Power 6 vs Power 8 backup speeds
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 08:15:01 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I will be happy to send you that spreadsheet.

Keep in mind that Power 8 is so impressive that Google is thinking of
abandoning Intel for it. And Google consumes at least 15% of all Intel
machines.
Why would anyone go for that old, legacy crap of Windows and Intel?

http://www.cnet.com/news/google-acquires-a-taste-for-ibms-power8-processors/
http://www.enterprisetech.com/2014/04/23/ibm-google-show-power8-systems-openpower-efforts/

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Power 6 vs Power 8 backup speeds , John Yeung

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.