RE: Navigator for i vrs. System i Navigator -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Navigator for i vrs. System i Navigator
From: Justin Taylor via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:12:15 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

IBM's work-around wasn't to not use Nav for I, just not to have it auto-start with TCP. Once TCP is up we can start it manually since (presumably) all the services running on dedicated ports are already running.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Navigator for i vrs. System i Navigator , via MIDRANGE-L

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.