Re: Why do companies partition their Power Servers? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Why do companies partition their Power Servers?
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:10:59 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

IASPs sound like a way of partitioning single-level store. But they don't
appear to be a way of partitioning runtime workloads. Or am I missing
something?

The scenario I have in mind is having various URLs route Web browser
requests to various HTTP Server / Web Portal instances, which separate
application runtime workloads and data into various IBM i subsystems,
libraries, and directories (or LPARs, alternatively), which have various
runtime resources (job queues, memory pools, time slices, runtime
priorities) allocated to them.

-Nathan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.