On 15-Jul-2014 11:56 -0500, Charles Wilt wrote:
<<SNIP>>  trying to script the built in <ed: FTP> client,
1) It's difficult if not impossible to always know an error has
occurred
2) You can't try to check for errors till the script has completed.
<<SNIP>>
  FWiW: The FTP subcommand SYSCMD allows calling a program inline to 
the scripted requests, such that a called program could perform the oft 
described-as /nigh to impossible task/ of error checking, at any point 
the System Command (SYSCMD) request was coded into the script.  And in 
response to an error being found when that program has parsed the 
OUTPUT, such a program could even issue an End Request (ENDRQS) to 
terminate the FTP client.  Or depending on how [or the level of control 
available to enforce how] the read of INPUT is effected by the FTP 
client [an implementation detail subject to change], the called program 
could even effect modifying the remainder of the script [if that program 
determined or was aware of what was the INPUT]; the program could change 
the Source Data (SRCDTA) of the next RRN of the INPUT to become the QUIT 
FTP subcommand.
  I know these techniques worked in the v4 and v5 time-frame.  I had 
long ago written some code, first as Proof Of Concept (POC), to do just 
that; IIRC the code /assumed/ the override to INPUT had included the 
SEQONLY(*YES 1) to ensure, given the implementation for the FTP client 
/read/ support at that time, a sequential un-buffered read method.  That 
code included both updating the OUTPUT records [of a PF-SRC] to indicate 
which line number of the INPUT provided the subcommand and updates to 
the Source Date (SRCDAT) of each record.  For just a few administrative 
tasks, I actually used that code; given how many times the FTP client 
had changed something with its implementation in the past however, and 
how typically processing of output scripts can have limitations similar 
to screen-scraping, I was not confident that something might not change 
to cause my code to no longer function properly [without any means 
available to overcome the issue].  As I recall, at some point I even 
improved the code, something with regard to taking advantage of the fact 
that the FTP client had changed to run in ACTGRP(*NEW).
  The same technique [including assumptions about implementation] also 
allows for creating a partial INPUT script, into which additional 
requests could be dynamically appended, or even a [user name and\or] 
password could be dynamically set [in lines using the FTP subcommands 
USER and\or PASS].  For example, additional PUT requests could be 
generated from data that was produced by an earlier DIR request that had 
been directed the directory listing to an output file; i.e. either a 
request to "DIR (DISK" or IMO the less desirable output from "LS (DISK"
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
	
 
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.