Re: performance characteristic of recently migrated lpar -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: performance characteristic of recently migrated lpar
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:48:14 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Rob,

Your CPU queuing percent doesn't sound good to me either. The
following article from Dawn May suggests a couple scenarios which
might cause high CPU queuing:

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/ibmi/library/i-ibmi-wait-accounting/i-ibmi-wait-accounting-pdf.pdf

But the scenarios suggested by Dawn May don't seem to align with your
low CPU utilization percent, low job count, low page faults, high disk
capacity, and relatively low memory usage. The WRKSYSSTS display would
seem to indicate that the partition has plenty of resources and is
performing very well.

Nathan.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: performance characteristic of recently migrated lpar , Jack Kingsley

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.