Re: QSECOFR Profile Oddness

[Jim Franz <franz9000@xxxxxxxxx>]

What do you mean by "see it signing on"? An actual telnet logon?
Jobs can still execute for a disabled profile. They are not "signing on",
they are just executing a job.

Jim Franz


On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Matt Lavinder <
mlavinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Does anyone know much about how QSECOFR is treated?  We did a penetration
> test back in July and during the test QSECOFR was disabled.  We did not
> find that out until today.  When we go to WRKUSRPRF it shows a successful
> sign-on occurring Saturday (8/9).  We IPL on Saturday, but it bugs us that
> we see it signing on when it was supposedly disabled.
>
> I am just looking for some peace of mind that this is what we should see.
>  When we discovered the profile was disabled we initially assumed it had
> been disabled after that successful sign-on Saturday morning, but the only
> disabled message we found in the logs occurred back in July.
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.