Re: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny
From: Sue Baker <sue.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 15 Sep
2014 18:32:14 GMT:

Any thoughts from the group?

Do you have the APs marked UNIT(*SSD)? Even with 100% SSD
configurations when running 7.1 or earlier releases, this can
change DB LIC task behavior for the better.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny , rob
RE: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny , Steinmetz, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.