Re: Another PTF Question

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 19-Dec-2014 06:30 -0600, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> <<SNIP>> The problem with LODPTF is that it does not support the
> *ALL option for LICPGM like INSPTF does.  You have to run it for
> each LICPGM.  It gets to be a hoot when something from SS1 won't
> load because it's missing one from 999 and you can't just load the
> one from 999 first because it's coreq is the one from SS1.
> Hence my fondness for INSPTF.

  Well if there was co-requisite enforcement during Load PTF (LODPTF) 
time, then I suppose there would be a concern in that regard.  However I 
am not aware, and quite confident, that is not a possible issue with 
load; there can be such issues, but during apply.  The Install Program 
Temporary Fix (INSPTF) of course does both the load and apply.