On 1/28/2015 5:31 AM, Birgitta Hauser wrote:
We just had a discussion tody concerning numeric date and time fields.
And just because I'm curisous:

How many of you are still using numeric fields (may be a rather big crowd -
at least those working with old applications)

We have hundreds of tables which use numeric fields instead of dates,
and as you suspect, these tables were designed 20 or 30 years ago.

But how many of you are using date fields in your tables where the year or
century year is NOT in the first position, i.e. in a Format MMDDYY or
MMDDYYYY or DDMMYY or DDMMYYYY?

Yes, we even have many numeric 'date' fields formatted this way. If I
had to guess, I would say that new tables (with genuine date columns)
make up 5% of our tables on the system. We are engaged in a very large
effort to rewrite the back end but we must keep the existing database
'design' running until the rewrite is complete.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.