Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:53:03 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Another interesting dilemma caused by the S/36. "Grouping" names by a
period in the name. Keeping in mind that the S/36 did not store data in
libraries - only programs. Then when you migrated these to the AS/400 you
had to start enclosing them with double quotes when doing any SQL on them.
(Think SQL naming convention vs System naming convention.) lib/obj vs
lib.obj

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.